ISRAEL EDUCATION #7
JERUSALEM AT THE TIME OF JESUS (CONTINNED)
THE TOMB OF JESUS
As with other sites of the events of the last days of Jesus' mortal life, there are two major possibilities for the location of his crucifixion, burial, and resurrection. According to scripture and Jewish customs, the site must have certain characteristics:
1. It must be outside the city walls, "nigh to the city" (John 19:20).
2. It must be near a main thoroughfare (see Matt. 27:39; Mark 15:29, John 19:20)
3. It must be a place of execution (see Mark 15:27; Luke 23:33).
4. There must be a garden nearby (John 19:41; 20:15).
5. The garden must contain at least one tomb (the tomb was near the place of crucifixion—John 19:41-42).
6. The rock tomb must be newly cut (Matt. 27:60; Luke 23:58; John 19:11).
7. It may have an anteroom (a mourning chamber) and several places for burial; in any case, it must be large enough to walk into (Mark 16:5; Luke 24:3; John 20:8)
8. It must have a large, heavy stone to seal the entrance, with a groove or trough for a stone to roll in (Matt 27:60; Mark 15:16; 16:4; Luke 24:2).
9. The tomb entrance must be small, so that one has to stoop to look inside: a person looking in from the outside could see the place where the body was laid (Luke 24:12; John 20:5, 11-12).
10. The tomb must have someplace when linen burial clothes could lie and where a "young man" cold sit (Mark 16:5), or where two angels could sit, one at the head and one at the foot of where Jesus' body had lain (John 20:12).
Let us consider these criteria as we examine the two options for the site of Jesus' crucifixion, burial, and resurrection.
Site one. The Church of the Holy Sepulcher has long been the traditional site of these venerated events. In the fourth century A.D. Constantine's mother, Helena, made a pilgrimage to the Holy Land and identified the spot, which had a pagan temple built over it. Recent excavations show that this site, though now within the walls of the Old City of Jerusalem, was outside the walls in Jesus' day. Its location just outside the western city wall could have provided a busy thoroughfare for travelers. There is no evidence that it was a place of execution or that there was a garden nearby. A stone quarry existed at the Holy Sepulcher site in the first century after Christ. Roman period tombs have been discovered in the bedrock below the church. They are kokhim, typical sepulchers from the period, rock-cut burial niches with enough space for a single body. There may have been room for someone to walk into the entry chamber of the tomb. There is no evidence that large stones could be rolled to seal the entrance or that there was a bench or shelf on which a body could be placed or on which someone could sit inside a sepulcher. Two angels could in no fashion situate themselves inside a kokh.
Site two. The other possible site is the Garden Tomb, just outside (north) of the Damascus Gate of today's Old City. The tome, discovered only last century, is not a place of pilgrimage for many thousands of Christians. This site was outside the walls of the city in Jesus' day along side a main thoroughfare. It appears to have been a place of execution; today's Damascus Gate was called "St. Stephen's Gate" during the first millennium after Christ, suggesting that Stephen was killed in this area. St. Stephen's Church)(St. Etienne), from the fifth century after Christ, is immediately north of this site. One of ancient Jerusalem's biggest cisterns and a wine-press identify the grounds as possibly having been a garden at that time.
Many tombs have been discovered in the vicinity, most of them dating to the seventh and eighth centuries before Christ. The Garden Tomb itself appears to be part of a complex of Judaean tombs from those centuries; most of the complex lies north of the Garden Tomb in what is now the property of the Ecole Biblique, the French School of Archaeology. These tombs, unlike the later kokhim, are chambers with side rooms branching off in several directions. Each chamber contained, usually, three benches on which bodies were placed. Underneath one of the benches in each room was a repository for bones, suggesting reuse of the tombs over many generations.
A "new tomb" could also mean a newly remodeled tomb not yet used in the newly cut form. The Garden Tomb is nearly identical in style to the older tombs but has some features of later styles. There is no repository for bones, no evidence that it was used many times. It does have more than one room and is large enough to walk into. There is no stone at its entrance, but the trough for rolling one into place is clearly visible. The original entrance was short enough to require stooping to enter. And there was a bench or shelf (before Byzantines or others later carved out a sarcophagus) on which burial clothes could have lain and on which angels could have sat, on the right side as one enters the tomb (see Mark 16:5).
Some have objected to the Garden Tomb as the burial place of Jesus because its structure appears to be of the style used seven or eight centuries earlier. There are tombs from the early Roman period, however, that combine both old Judaean and Roman-period styles. At Khirbet Midras in the Shephelah, for example, is a tomb complex dating to the first century before Christ that has the older chambers containing benches but also features the later kokhim, or niches, and sarcophagi and ossuaries. Even the St. Etienne tomb complex, of which the Garden Tomb seems to be a part, has a chamber with sarcophagi quite distinct from the other chambers. While investigating ornate tombs in the Hinnom Valley, Leon Ritmeyer noted that some of the tombs that originated in the First Temple period were adapted and reused in the Second Temple period (early Roman period). "One of [the] side chambers with First Temple-period burial benches leads into an elaborate system of five tomb chambers with kokhim. In this way, too, the First Temple-period tomb was re-used and exte3nded in the Second Temple period."
Of the two possible sites, the enduring reverence of tradition favors the Ho9ly Sepulcher site, but the Garden Tomb more completely matches the scriptural description. There is presently no way to know if one of these two sites or yet another site was used for Jesus' burial. Regardless of investigations and evidences and surmises and conclusions, it is not wise to affix faith to a particular site. Belief is beyond physical territory. To the Christian, the most important message is, "He is risen; he is not here" (Mark 16:6).
THEOLOGICAL RATIONALE FOR JESUS' BURIAL SITE
A more theological or philosophical reasoning may be advanced for looking to the north for the place where Jesus' sacrifice occurred. We recall that two millennia before Christ, Abraham made the long, strenuous trek from Beersheba to Mount Moriah, later known as the Temple Mount (2 Chron. 3:1). He knew how repulsive and foreign human sacrifice is to the true worship of God, yet the command had been given to sacrifice his son. The test was perfectly designed for Abraham, who with Sarah had waited so many years for the covenant son, whom he loved. Now the Lord called on him to sacrifice, to give up, that beloved son. Paul wrote that "by faith Abraham, when he was tried, offered up Isaac: and he that had received the promises offered up his only begotten son" (Heb. 11:17). Abraham's offering of his son Isaac was a similitude of God's offering his Only Begotten Son. And both may have been accomplished at the same location. By following the hill of Moriah northward to just outside the Second Wall of the city, we see a prominence where the Garden Tomb and other nearby tombs are situated, which was apparently a site of execution and burial in antiquity.
When Abraham and Isaac approached Moriah, Isaac reminded his father that they had the wood for the sacrifice but asked where the sacrifice was. Abraham prophetically responded, "My son, God [Elohim in the Hebrew text] will provide himself a lamb" (Gen. 22:7-8). When Abraham's test was consummated, and the angel of the Lord stopped the sacrifice of the son, a ram (not a lamb) was substituted. But two thousand years later, possibly on the northern extension of this same mountain, God did provide a lamb—the Lamb of God was sacrificed. We recall that a lamb slain on the great altar of the temple was slain on the north side of the altar (see Lev. 1:11).
Abraham knew something of the meaning of his similitude-sacrifice. He had uttered prophetically—not unintentionally or accidentally—that God would provide a lamb as a sacrifice, and he knew that the Son would be that sacrifice, to be made at that very place—the reason for the long trek to Moriah instead of using some hill in the Negev. Jesus said in the Temple itse3lf, "Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it and was glad" (John 8:56).
Thus, the Passover Lamb was slain at Passover time on the north of the Altar of Moriah as an atonement for sin, the symbolic and typical purpose of all the lambs slain on the Temple altar over the centuries—those sacrifices all prefigured that greatest Sacrifice.
Get more out of the Web. Learn 10 hidden secrets of Windows Live.
Learn Now